[…] acogió con satisfacción la exclusión del Ley de lucha contra los drones del PCCh (Ley CCCPD) del lenguaje final de la NDAA. La legislación propuesta habría eliminado los productos DJI del […]

It’s just sad that people are more worried about drones than guns or people texting while driving. Drones never killed anyone.

I’ve heard of this before — it certainly sounds like a definite threat. And I’m sure our government knows the dangers. But, as usual, they do nothing to prevent a problem, they just let it go and blame Trump.

I have been earing about EMP for decades in my favorite genre of movies, Science fiction, but of course most stuff comes true eventually.

Please describe he regulatory oversight of these operations

This is a great idea. Why is it not advertised more? I found it by accident. I was planning on buy a drone and training an employee to operate equipment. This opens up new avenues.

[…] Congressional Hearing Advances Drone Integration for Public Safety […]

Why do we have to hear about AUVSI’s biased view in every DroneLife article these days? Please drop the AUVSI have-beens and report the news as it is. AUVSI has done nothing but try to destroy the commercial and recreational drone industry.

In reply to David Terrazas.

The problem is with your cell phone bystanders “can visually see you” – the operator – and judge you, your body language, your mannerisms, etc. to logically deduct if you are using your cell phone appropriately (or not) given any chance meeting or yourself noticed by others. With drones, there is none of that and the fear automatically jumps to intent of invasion of privacy.

As an example, it’s known that unless the face of robotic humanoids APPEAR 100% human in the face that bystanders whom visually see such high technology **will not** trust it. This is the same challenge and problem drones have set against them from those not familiar within the industry.

can i buy shares in the company