Three days after the FAA unveiled its long-awaited proposed rule to enable routine Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) drone operations, industry stakeholders are offering both praise and caution. The proposed BVLOS drone rule, published on August 5, outlines a national regulatory framework that replaces case-by-case waivers with a structured, scalable approach.

For many, it’s the long-awaited moment that could move the U.S. drone industry from one-off approvals to predictable, commercial scale. But others worry that overly broad requirements and operational overhead could introduce new burdens — particularly for proven, low-risk use cases.

“This is an exciting milestone, but the devil is in the details — and I just hope we’re taking steps forward and not taking steps back,” said Ryan Smith, President and Founder of Titan Protection and Consulting. “Under our current nationwide BVLOS waiver Titan has been able to safely deploy a solution that can save businesses up to 60 percent on security costs, so we want to be able to continue that momentum without being subjected to unnecessary expenses and regulations.”

Smith said his team has “concerns about a couple critical areas: potential new hardware mandates, such as detect-and-avoid systems, and that relatively low-risk, proven use cases like ours may be treated the same as higher-risk or more complex operations.”

A regulatory framework with scale — and strings

For companies deeply invested in drone airspace infrastructure, the rule (read the full text here) is more than welcome.

“This proposed rule is a watershed moment for our industry that will accelerate drone innovation across every sector from logistics and agriculture to public safety and emergency response,” said Michael Healander, CEO of Airspace Link, noting how the proposed rule, if enacted, would remove regulatory barriers. “By establishing mandatory airspace intelligence and coordination services, the FAA is acknowledging that the future of safe, scalable drone operations depends on sophisticated digital infrastructure.”

Airspace Link’s Vice President of Marketing, Rich Fahle, said that the proposal represents “the FAA’s most comprehensive regulatory framework for enabling widespread Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) drone operations in the United States.”

Fahle pointed to the creation of Part 146, which introduces certification for “automated data service providers” — entities responsible for essential services like conflict detection and conformance monitoring.

And for companies like Airspace Link, the proposed rule (if passed) also creates business opportunities.

“It essentially mandates demand for our core services while providing a clear regulatory pathway to expand our business,” Fahle said. “Cities, agencies, and operators get a predictable path to deliveries, inspections and public-safety missions.”

Industry optimism, with a warning on costs

Among drone traffic management firms and UTM pioneers, the FAA’s proposal drew strong support particularly for its emphasis on digital oversight and performance-based safety.

“This is the FAA’s most consequential step yet toward fully integrating drones into the national airspace,” said Amit Ganjoo, Founder and CEO of ANRA Technologies. “It replaces an ad hoc waiver system with a scalable, performance-based rule that supports everything from package delivery to public safety missions.”

And again, that’s where Part 146 comes in, which Ganjoo says “provides the missing regulatory link for UTM.”

“It establishes certification and accountability for data service providers that will manage conflict detection, conformance monitoring and other critical capabilities needed for BVLOS operations at scale,” he said. But he also emphasized that the NPRM is a starting point, and that changes can and should be expected.

“Industry stakeholders must engage during the comment period to ensure the final rule supports innovation while meeting safety objectives,” he said.

Operational gains — and unexpected flexibility

So what are the most surprising or lesser-discussed aspects of the proposed BVLOS drone rule?

“The Multi-aircraft oversight allowed with method approval was not something I expected to see this soon and it opens the door to one-to-many ops as tech and maturity improves,” said James McDanolds, Program Chair, School of Uncrewed Technology at Sonoran Desert Institute.

Though that could expand certain applications and potentially reduce operator costs to a business, that flexibility may come at a price, which could include Part 146 services.

“If you must buy deconfliction or conformance from approved providers in many contexts, that’s recurring spend and possible vendor lock-in,” he warned.

All that operational overhead could be great for continued ensured safety, but it could add huge, potential administrative load for startups and public-safety units.”

What international drone pilots say about America’s proposed BVLOS drone rule

Drone operator and trainer Cameron Board, an Australia-based pilot at CASA-certified Flying Glass, it’s good news. He said he believes the U.S. framework could be a sign of global momentum.

“From our vantage point, the FAA’s proposal is a big step forward,” Board said. “Structuring BVLOS under Part 108, with clearer certification pathways, defined operational corridors and technology-based requirements like ADS-B or automated deconfliction services, could genuinely unlock scale.”

He noted that in Australia, BVLOS flight still depends on approvals under standard scenarios or specific certifications like the IREX.

“Our process is quite mature in terms of documentation, but still heavily reliant on individual permissions and risk assessments for each operation.”

What stood out to Board was that “the shift away from waivers as the default could lower the barrier for smaller operators, which is still a sticking point here in Australia.”

Eyes on implementation

The tone across all responses is clear: The NPRM is promising, but it’s not final. How it evolves will determine how quickly commercial drone use can scale.

“The FAA’s proposed BVLOS rule lays out a clear path forward after years of case-by-case waivers and uncertainty,” said Alex Norman, Matternet Head of Global Flight Operations & Services. Matternet is one of the drone delivery companies that has been limited thus far by the current approval process (as evidenced by my own experience getting their drones to send me a chocolate bar).

“It gives drone operators a scalable framework for routine operations, and provides the kind of regulatory clarity that investors, partners and customers have been waiting for.”

But he said there are still some key hurdles.

“Detect-and-avoid tech must meet performance standards. UTM services under Part 146 need to be widely deployed and trusted. Environmental reviews and community concerns — especially around privacy and noise — could slow rollout in certain areas. And of course, this is still just a proposed rule.”

The public comment period is now open for 60 days. Comments can be submitted via Regulations.gov under docket number FAA-2025-1908.

The post Experts react to FAA’s proposed BVLOS drone rule — game-changer or growing pains? appeared first on The Drone Girl.